4.4 Article

Activity-unrelated neural control of myogenic factors in a slow muscle

期刊

MUSCLE & NERVE
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 49-60

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mus.20433

关键词

bromodeoxyuridine; denervation; disuse; myogene regulatory factors; satellite cells; spinal cord isolation

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [P01NS016333] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The properties of skeletal muscles are modulated by neural and nonneural factors, and the neural factors can be modulated by activity-independent as well as activity-dependent mechanisms. Given that daily activation of fast muscles is considerably less than of slow muscles, we hypothesized that the myogenic properties of the rat soleus (a slow muscle) would be more dependent on activity-dependent than activity-independent factors. Muscle mass, MyoD, and myogenin mRNA and protein levels, and satellite cell proliferation and differentiation rates (bromodeoxyuridine incorporation) were examined at 3, 14, and 28 days after either spinal cord isolation (Sl, neuromuscular connectivity intact with minimal activation) or denervation (no neural influence). Soleus atrophy was similar in the Sl and denervated groups at each time point, although increases in whole-muscle expression of myogenin and, to a lesser degree, MyoD were lower (P < 0.05) in Sl than denervated soleus muscles. Proliferation and differentiation of satellite cells, as well as mitotic activity of connective tissue cells, were lower (P < 0.05) in Sl than denervated soleus muscles. In some instances, these changes were not observed until the later time points, i.e., 14 or 28 days. These results demonstrate that the motoneurons that innervate the slow soleus muscle have a significant modulatory influence on some muscle properties via mechanisms that are independent of activation. These activity-independent modulatory influences, however, are less in the slow soleus than previously observed in fast muscles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据