4.0 Article

Photochemical efficiency of tropical forage grasses submitted to water deficit

出版社

REVISTA BRASILEIRA ZOOTECNIA BRAZILIAN JOURNAL ANIMAL SCI
DOI: 10.1590/S1516-35982006000100008

关键词

chlorophyll a fluorescence; electron transport relative rate; photosynthesis; photosystem II

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, individuals of setariagrass (Setaria anceps Stapf.), limpograss (Hemarthria altissima [Poir] Stapf. & Hubbard), nilograss (Acroceras macrum Stapf.) and angola grass (Brachiaria purpurascens [Raddi] Henr.) were Submitted to moderate drought. The characteristics of chlorophyll a fluorescence (inicial fluorescence, F-0; maximum fluorescence, F-m; photochemistry efficiency, F-v/F-m photochemical quenching, qP; non-photochemical quenching, qN and relative electron transport rate, ETR) were investigated in an experiment carried Out in greenhouse, using plastic pots. The experimental treatments were allocated in a randomized complete blocks design, with three replications. The values of F. and F,,, decreased in all species after 10 days of drought, this effect being more evident in nilograss and setariagrass. The F-v/F-m values for nilograss and setariagrass decreased dramatically while that one for hemarthriagrass did not differ from the control. This results suggest a lower photochemical efficiency of photosynthesis in nilograss and setariagrass under water stress compared to hemarthriagrass and to the healthy plants. The highest values of qN were observed for hemarthriagraas and angolagrass. This showed that the increased capacity to dissipate the excessive energy to drive photosynthesis was satisfactory to maintain a low reduction state of the primary electron acceptor of the photosystem II (measured as qP). In general, ETR curves in response to increasing photosynthetic photon flux differed from control to stressed plants. especially for nilograss. In this species, a serious damage caused by water stress provoked a significant reduction to the efficiency of the electron transporters of PSII.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据