4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Left lateralized white matter microstructure accounts for individual differences in reading ability and disability

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
卷 44, 期 11, 页码 2178-2188

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.011

关键词

development; reading; brain; white matter; MRI; diffusion tensor imaging; DTI; children; reading disability; dyslexia; double dissociation; working memory; short term memory; fiber-tracking

资金

  1. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [P50HD025802] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [P50 HD25802-13] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was used to investigate the association between variation in white matter microstructure and individual differences in reading skill within children. Unlike previous DTI studies of reading, our sample examined children in both the average reading range as well as several children in the performance range of reading disability (RD). Results replicate previous findings of a strong correlation between fractional anisotropy (FA) values in a left temporo-parietal white matter region and standardized reading scores of typically developing children. Furthermore, FA values in this same region accounted for differences between children scoring in the average range and children scoring in the RD range, suggesting that the role of white matter tract microstructure is best characterized as an extreme range on a continuum of typical variation. Furthermore, significant correlations between working memory and frontal white matter tract regions were present in this same population, yet were demonstrated to be independent of the relationships found between reading and more posterior regions. Results form a correlational double dissociation that demonstrates domain specificity in the influence of white matter tract structures to individual differences in cognitive performance. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据