4.5 Article

Effects of nocturnal oxygen therapy on outcome measures in patients with chronic heart failure and Cheyne-Stokes respiration

期刊

CIRCULATION JOURNAL
卷 70, 期 1, 页码 1-7

出版社

JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
DOI: 10.1253/circj.70.1

关键词

non-pharmacological treatment; sleep-disordered breathing; Specific Activity Scale

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The effects of nasal oxygen (O-2) Supply at night using conventional home oxygen therapy (HOT) equipment on quality of life (QOL) and sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) were evaluated in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Nasal nocturnal O-2 therapy not only stabilizes SDB but also reduces sympathetic activity, and improves exercise capacity in patients with CHF. However, the effects of oxygen on the cardiac function and QOL of heart failure patients have not been fully elucidated. Methods and Results Fifty-six patients with CHF (New York Heart Association class II-III, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <= 45%) and central sleep apnea (CSA) with Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) were randomly assigned to receive either nocturnal 02 (HOT group, n=25) or usual breathing (control group, n=31) for 12 weeks. Respiration, airflow and arterial oxygen levels were monitored with determination of apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI) during sleep. LV function was determined by radionuclide angiography or echocardiography. QOL was assessed by the Specific Activity Scale questionnaire. In the HOT group, nocturnal 02 resulted in significant improvements in AHI (21.0 +/- 1.0.8 to 10.0 +/- 11.6 events/h, mean +/- SD, p<0.001), ODI (19.5 +/- 9.8 to 5.9 +/- 8.7 dips/h, p<0.001) and Specific Activity scale (4.0 +/- 1.2 to 5.0 +/- 1.5 Mets, p< 0.001.). LVEF also increased from baseline to the end of the study (34.7 +/- 10.4 to 38.2 +/- 13.6%, p=0.022). Conclusions In patients with stable CHF and CSR, HOT at night improves SDB, LV function and QOL, and thus is a valuable nonpharmacological option for the treatment of patients with CHF and CSR-CSA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据