4.7 Article

Increased EEG power and slowed dominant frequency in patients with neurogenic pain

期刊

BRAIN
卷 129, 期 -, 页码 55-64

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh631

关键词

neuropathic pain; central pain; thalamocortical system; thalamotomy; EEG oscillations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To study the mechanisms of chronic neurogenic pain, we compared the power spectra of the resting EEG of patients (n = 15, 38-75 years, median 64 years, 6 women) and healthy controls (n = 15, 41-71 years, median 60 years, 8 women). On an average, the patient group exhibited higher spectral power over the frequency range of 2-25 Hz, and the dominant peak was shifted towards lower frequencies. Maximal differences appeared in the 7-9 Hz band in all electrodes. Frontal electrodes contributed most to this difference in the 13-15 Hz band. Bicoherence analysis suggests an enhanced coupling between theta (4-9 Hz) and beta (12-25 Hz) frequencies in patients. The subgroup of six patients free from centrally acting medication showed higher spectral power in the 2-18 Hz frequency range. On an individual basis, the combination of peak height and peak frequency discriminated between patient and control groups: discriminant analysis classified 87% of all subjects correctly. After a therapeutic lesion in the thalamus (central lateral thalamotomy, CLT) we carried out follow-up for a subgroup of seven patients. Median pain relief was 70 and 95% after 3 and 12 months, respectively. The average EEG power of all seven patients gradually decreased in the theta band and approached normal values only after 12 months. The excess theta EEG power in patients and its decrease after thalamic surgery suggests that both EEG and neurogenic pain are determined by tightly coupled thalamocortical loops. The small therapeutic CLT lesion is thought to initiate a progressive normalization in the affected thalamocortical system, which is reflected in both decrease of EEG power and pain relief.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据