4.4 Review

Diet, gender, and colorectal neoplasia

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 41, 期 8, 页码 731-746

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3180338e56

关键词

diet; colorectal; cancer; adenoma

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [1K07CA106269-01A1, P01 CA41108, CA95060] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P50CA095060, K07CA106269, P01CA041108] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The association between diet and colorectal cancer has been studied in depth for many decades, with equivocal results. It has been hypothesized that cancers arising in the distal and proximal colon have different pathologies, and therefore different risk factors. As such, it is possible that diet-related factors might influence colorectal neoplasia differently depending on the subsite. Recent evidence indicates that women may be more likely to develop proximal cancers than men. Additionally, the link between certain dietary factors and colorectal neoplasia in women seems to vary by menopausal status. Given these observations, women may be affected differently than men by diet-related factors. The objective of this article was therefore to review the data for diet and colorectal adenomas and cancer, and then attempt to address the potential differences in the association of diet-related factors and colorectal neoplasia in men and women. For total energy intake, selenium, and fiber, it seems that there may be slightly stronger effects in men as compared with women, whereas calcium and folate seem to affect both sexes similarly. With regard to vitamin D and colorectal cancer, women may exhibit stronger associations than men. Perhaps the most evidence for a sex-specific effect is observed for obesity. where more substantial direct relationships between body size and colorectal neoplasia have been reported for men than for women. However, this observation may be influenced by the differential effects in women by menopausal status. Further research on sex-specific dietary effects is warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据