4.5 Article

Deletion at ITPR1 underlies ataxia in mice and spinocerebellar ataxia 15 in humans

期刊

PLOS GENETICS
卷 3, 期 6, 页码 1076-1082

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030108

关键词

-

资金

  1. MRC [G0701075, G0500288, G108/638] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [ZIAHD001206, Z01HD001206] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [Z01NS002974, ZIANS002974] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [ZIAAG000958, Z01AG000959, ZIAAG000953, ZIAAG000959, Z01AG000958, Z01AG000953] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline
  6. Medical Research Council [G108/638, G0500288, G0701075] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We observed a severe autosomal recessive movement disorder in mice used within our laboratory. We pursued a series of experiments to define the genetic lesion underlying this disorder and to identify a cognate disease in humans with mutation at the same locus. Through linkage and sequence analysis we show here that this disorder is caused by a homozygous in-frame 18-bp deletion in Itpr1 (Itpr1D18/D18), encoding inositol 1,4,5- triphosphate receptor 1. A previously reported spontaneous Itpr1 mutation in mice causes a phenotype identical to that observed here. In both models in- frame deletion within Itpr1 leads to a decrease in the normally high level of Itpr1 expression in cerebellar Purkinje cells. Spinocerebellar ataxia 15 (SCA15), a human autosomal dominant disorder, maps to the genomic region containing ITPR1; however, to date no causal mutations had been identified. Because ataxia is a prominent feature in Itpr1 mutant mice, we performed a series of experiments to test the hypothesis that mutation at ITPR1 may be the cause of SCA15. We show here that heterozygous deletion of the 59 part of the ITPR1 gene, encompassing exons 1-10, 1-40, and 1-44 in three studied families, underlies SCA15 in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据