4.5 Article

Epigenetic regulation of bone morphogenetic protein-6 gene expression in breast cancer cells

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2007.01.002

关键词

epigenetic regulation; 5-aza-2 '-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC); methylation-sensitive enzyme restriction PCR (MSRE-PCR); bisulfite sequencing (BSG); methylation-specific PCR (MSP); estrogen receptor (ER)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bone morphogenetic protein-6 (BMP-6) is closely correlated with tumor differentiation and skeletal metastasis. Our previous research found that BMP-6 gene expression can be activated dose-dependently by estrogen in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer cell line MCF-7. but not in ER negative (ER-) cell line MDA-MB-231. This experiment is designed to investigate the epigenetic regulatory mechanism of the BMP-6 gene expression in breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231, MCF-7 and T47D with regard to the methylation status in the 5' flanking region of the human BMP-6 gene. The endogenous level of BNIP-6 mRNA in ER- cell line MDA-MB-231 was relatively lower than that in ER+ MCF-7 and T47D cell lines. After the treatment with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC, especially in the concentration of 10 mu M), the BMP-6 mRNA expression in MDA-MB-231 was obviously up-regulated. However, 5-aza-dC treatment failed to regulate the expression of BNIP-6 in MCF-7 and T47D cells. Using enzyme restriction PCR (MSRE-PCR), as well as bisulfite sequencing (BSG), methylation of human BNIP-6 gene promoter was detected in MDA-MB-231; while in MCF-7 and T47D, BMP-6 gene promoter remained demethylated status. In 33 breast tumor specimens, promoter methylation of BMP-6 was detected by methylation-specific PCR, hypermethylation of BMP-6 was observed in ER negative cases (16 of 16 cases (100%)), while obviously lower methylation frequency were observed in ER positive cases (3 of 17 cases (18%)), indicating that BMP-6 promoter methylation status is correlated with ER status in breast cancer. (c) 2007 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据