4.8 Article

Association of Estrogen Receptor α and Histone Deacetylase 6 Causes Rapid Deacetylation of Tubulin in Breast Cancer Cells

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 69, 期 7, 页码 2935-2940

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3458

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha) is a nuclear receptor that functions as a ligand-activated transcription factor. Besides its genomic action in nuclei, ER alpha could exert nongenomic actions at the plasma membrane. To investigate the mechanism underlying the nongenomic action of ER alpha in breast cancer cells, we generated a construct of membrane-targeted ER alpha (memER), an expression vector of ER alpha without the nuclear localizing signal and including instead the membrane-targeting sequence of Src kinase. MemER was stably expressed in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells. Cell migration test and tumorigenic assay in nude mice revealed that the in vitro motility and the in vivo proliferation activity of MCF-7 cells expressing memER were significantly enhanced compared with those of vector-transfected cells. Interestingly, the acetylation level of tubulin in memER-overexpressing cells was lower than that in control cells. We found that histone deacetylase (HDAC) 6 translocated to the plasma membrane shortly after estrogen stimulation, and rapid tubulin deacetylation subsequently occurred. We also showed that memER associated with HDAC6 in a ligand-dependent manner. Although tamoxifen is known for its antagonistic role in the ER alpha genomic action in MCF-7 cells, the agent showed an agonistic function in the memER-HDAC6 association and tubulin deacetylation. These findings suggest that ER alpha ligand dependently forms a complex with HDAC6 and tubulin at the plasma membrane. Estrogen-dependent tubulin deacetylation could provide new evidence for the nongenomic action of estrogen, which potentially contributes to the aggressiveness of ER alpha-positive breast cancer cells. [Cancer Res 2009;69(7):2935-40]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据