4.8 Article

Functional Role of S100A14 Genetic Variants and Their Association with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 69, 期 8, 页码 3451-3457

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4231

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National 863 High Tech Project of China [2006AA027A67]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2004CB518701, 2006CB910407]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30671167, 30425027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

5100 proteins have been implicated in various human diseases, including certain types of cancer. Among them, S100A14 is down-regulated in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). In this study, we sought to identify functional genetic variants in the S100A14 locus and assessed their associations with susceptibility to ESCC. Thirty individual DNA samples were sequenced to search for genetic variations in S100A14, and the function of the variants was investigated by a set of biochemical assays. A case-control analysis was perfoxmed in 1,021 patients with ESCC and 1,253 control subjects. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% Cl) were computed by logistic regression model. Four single nucleotide polymorphisms, -43A>G, 461G>A, 1493A>G, and 1545A>T, were identified in the S100A14 locus and they are in absolute linkage disequilibrium. Among them, the 461G>A change was shown to diminish a P53-binding site and is therefore associated with decreased expression of S100A14 in vitro and in viva in the target tissues. Case-control analysis showed that the 461A allele was associated with susceptibility to ESCC among smokers, with the Oils being 2.01 (95% Cl, 1.50-2.69) or 2.10 (95% CI, 1.37-3.22) for the 461GA or 461AA genotype, respectively, compared with the 461GG genotype. These data constitute strong evidence in support of the notion that S100A14 might function as a cancer suppressor working in the P53 pathway and play a role in esophageal carcinogenesis. [Cancer Res 2009;69(8):3451-7]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据