4.6 Review

Modulation of the endocannabinoid system by lipid rafts

期刊

CURRENT MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 14, 期 25, 页码 2702-2715

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/092986707782023235

关键词

cannabinoid receptors; caveolin; cholesterol; lipophilicity; membrane; signal transduction; transport; vanilloid receptor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Endocannabinoids like anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol bind and activate type-1 (CB I R) and type-2 (CB2R) cannabinoid receptors, two inhibitory G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that are localized in the central nervous system and in peripheral tissues. The biological actions of these lipids are controlled through not yet fully characterized cellular mechanisms that regulate the release of endocannabinoids from membrane precursors, their uptake by cells, and their intracellular disposal. The transport of anadamide through the plasma membrane is saturable and energy-independent, and might occur through a putative anandamide membrane transporter. Altogether anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol, their congeners and the proteins that bind, transport, synthesize and hydrolyze these lipids, form the endocannabinoid system. Accumulating evidence shows that CB I R (but not CB2R) binding and signaling, as well as anandamide transport, are under the control of lipid rafts (LRs), plasma membrane subdomains which modulate the activity of a number of GPCRs. Here we summarize the main features of the endocannabinoid system and LRs, in order to put the functional and structural effects of LRs on CB receptors, AEA transport and endocannabinoid signaling in a better focus. We outline the structural determinants that might explain the differential sensitivity of cannabic receptors towards raft integrity, and propose a general model to explain the dependence of endocannabinoid system on LRs. Finally, we also discuss the possible exploitation of LRs-targeted drugs as novel therapeutics for the treatment of endocannabinoid system-related pathologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据