4.8 Article

Therapeutic efficacy of ABT-737, a selective inhibitor of BCL-2, in small cell lung cancer

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 68, 期 7, 页码 2321-2328

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5031

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA06973-44, P30 CA006973, P30 CA006973-44] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bcl-2 is a central regulator of cell survival that is overexpressed in the majority of small cell lung cancers (SCLC) and contributes to both malignant transformation and therapeutic resistance. We compared primary SCLC xenografts prepared from de novo human tumors with standard cell line-based xenografts in the evaluation of a novel and highly potent small molecule inhibitor of Bcl-2, ABT-737. ABT-737 induced dramatic regressions in tumors derived from some SCLC cell lines. In contrast, only one of three primary xenograft SCLC tumors showed significant growth inhibition with ABT-737. Explanations for this apparent dichotomy may include relatively low expression of Bcl-2 in the primary xenografts or inherent differences in the model systems. The addition of etoposide to ABT-737 in the primary xenografts resulted in significant decreases in tumor growth, underscoring the clinical potential of ABT-737 in combination therapy. To identify factors that may contribute to resistance to ABT-737 and related inhibitors, we isolated resistant derivatives of an initially sensitive cell line-based xenograft. Acquired resistance in this model was associated with decreases in the expression of the primary target Bcl-2, of proapoptotic partners of Bcl-2 (Bax and Bim), and of Bcl-2:Bim heterodimers. Expression profiling reveals 85 candidate genes demonstrating consistent changes in gene expression with acquired resistance. Taken together, these data have specific implications for the clinical development of Bcl-2 inhibitors for SCLC and broader implications for the testing of novel anticancer strategies in relevant preclinical models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据