4.8 Article

BRAF V600E disrupts AZD6244-Induced abrogation of negative feedback pathways between extracellular signal-regulated kinase and Raf proteins

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 68, 期 15, 页码 6145-6153

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1430

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AZD6244 (ARRY 142886) is a potent and selective mitogenactivated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) kinase (MEK) inhibitor currently in early clinical trials. We examined the activity of AZD6244 in a panel of non-small cell lung cancer and a panel of cell lines representing many cancer types using in vitro growth assays. AZD6244 induced Go-G, cell cycle arrest in sensitive cell lines that primarily included cells containing the BRAF V600E mutation. In these cells, GO-G, arrest is accompanied by the up-regulation of the cell cycle inhibitors p2l WAF I and P27vjpl and downregulation of cyclin DI. In the majority of cell lines tested, including those with K-ras or non-V600E BRAF mutations, AZD6244 induced the accumulation of phospho-MEK, an effect not observed in the most sensitive BRAF V600E-containing cells. Accumulation of phospho-MEK in non-V600E-containing cell lines is due to abrogation of negative feedback pathways. BRAF V600E disrupts negative feedback signaling, which results in enhanced baseline phospho-MEK expression. Exogenous expression of BRAF V600E disrupts feedback inhibition but does not sensitize cells to AZD6244. Specific suppression of endogenous BRAF V600E does not confer resistance to AZD6244 but enhances sensitivity to AZD6244. Thus, our findings show that BRAF V600E marks cells with an in vitro requirement for NUM signaling to support proliferation. These cells are exquisitely sensitive to AZD6244 (IC501 < 100 nmol/L), have high baseline levels of phospho-MEK, and lack feedback inhibition between ERK and Raf. These data suggest an approach to identifying cells that may be sensitive to AZD6244 and other MEK inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据