4.8 Article

Carcinogen-induced Gene Promoter Hypermethylation Is Mediated by DNMT1 and Causal for Transformation of Immortalized Bronchial Epithelial Cells

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 68, 期 21, 页码 9005-9014

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1276

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIH [R01 ES008801, F31 CA1170593]
  2. Lung Cancer Specialized Programs of Research Excellence [P50 CA75907, NSCOR NNJ05HD36G]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A better understanding of key molecular changes during transformation of lung epithelial cells could affect strategies to reduce mortality from lung cancer. This study uses an in vitro model to identify key molecular changes that drive cell transformation and the likely clonal outgrowth of preneoplastic lung epithelial cells that occurs in the chronic smoker. Here, we show differences in transformation efficiency associated with DNA repair capacity for two hTERT/cyclin-dependent kinase 4, immortalized bronchial epithelial cell lines after low-dose treatment with the carcinogens methyl-nitrosourea, benzo(a)pyrene-diolepoxide 1, or both for 12 weeks. Levels of cytosine-DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) protein increased significantly during carcinogen exposure and were associated with the detection of promoter hyper-methylation of 5 to 10 genes in each transformed cell line. Multiple members of the cadherin gene family were commonly methylated during transformation. Stable knockdown of DNMT1 reversed transformation and gene silencing. Moreover, stable knockdown of DNMT1 protein before carcinogen treatment prevented transformation and methylation of cadherin genes. These studies provide a mechanistic link between increased DNMT1 protein, de novo methylation of tumor suppressor genes, and reduced DNA repair capacity that together seem causal for transformation of lung epithelial cells. This finding supports the development of demethylation strategies for primary prevention of lung cancer in smokers. [Cancer Res 2008;68(2.1,):9005-14]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据