4.8 Article

IFN-α and Bortezomib Overcome Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 Overexpression in Melanoma Cells by Stimulating the Extrinsic Pathway of Apoptosis

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 68, 期 20, 页码 8351-8360

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0426

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. The Harry J. Lloyd Charitable Trust
  2. The Melanoma Research Foundation
  3. The Valvano Foundation for Cancer Research
  4. NIH [CA84402, K24-CA93670, P30-CA16058, P01-CA95426]
  5. Millennium pharmaceuticals, Inc
  6. Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We hypothesized that IFN-alpha would enhance the apoptotic activity of bortezomib on melanoma cells. Combined treatment with bortezomib and IFN-alpha induced synergistic apoptosis in melanoma and other solid tumor cell lines. Apoptosis was associated with processing of procaspase-3, procaspase-7, procaspase-8, and procaspase-9 and with cleavage of Bid and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Bortezomib plus IFN-alpha was effective at inducing apoptosis in melanoma cells that overexpressed Bcl-2 or Mcl-1, suggesting that this treatment combination can overcome mitochondrial pathways of cell survival and resistance to apoptosis. The proapoptotic effects of this treatment combination were abrogated by a caspase-8 inhibitor, led to increased association of Fas and FADD before the onset of cell death, and were significantly reduced in cells transfected with a dominant-negative FADD construct or small interfering RNA targeting Fas. These data suggest that bortezomib and IFN-alpha act through the extrinsic pathway of apoptosis via FADD-induced caspase-8 activation to initiate cell death. Finally, bortezomib and IFN-alpha displayed statistically significant antitumor activity compared with either agent alone in both the B16 murine model of melanoma and in athymic mice bearing human A375 xenografts. These data support the future clinical development of bortezomib and IFN-alpha for malignant melanoma. [Cancer Res 2008;68(20):8351-60]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据