4.7 Article

Free radical scavenging, inhibition of polyphenoloxidase activity and copper chelating properties of model Maillard systems

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 40, 期 8, 页码 1434-1444

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2006.09.007

关键词

Maillard reaction product (MRP); antioxidam; free radical scavenging activity; copper chelating; polyphenoloxidase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antioxidant properties of Maillard reaction products (MRP) obtained from aqueous mixtures of glucose (0.8 mol/l) with proline, glycine, arginine, lysine, cysteine or glutathione (0.5 mol/l) heated at 103 degrees C for 1-92 h were investigated using different in vitro tests. Free radical scavenging activity was determined by measuring their reactivity towards DPPH degrees and lipidic radicals produced by AAPH. Contrary to glucose-proline and glucose-glycine MRP, glucose-lysine and glucose-arginine MRP displayed high scavenging activities. The activity of glucose-lysine MRP peaked after 14h of heating while the activity of glucose-arginine constantly increased during the whole heat treatment. The high scavenging capacity observed towards DPPH degrees for glucose-cysteine mixtures could be attributed to the sulfhydryl group of cysteine. The inhibitory effect of MRP on activity of two copper-oxidoreductases, apple polyphenoloxidase and mushroom tyrosinase, assessed by polarography, showed that thiol-derived MRP were the most potent inhibitors, even at very low levels in the reaction medium. Conversely, the other MRP were only slightly efficient at high levels. Unheated mixtures containing thiol compounds exhibited a potent copper chelating ability, as efficient as EDTA, when determined by the tetramethylmurexide (TMM) test. After heating, these mixtures lost part of their chelating efficiency, but it remained higher than that of the other MRP, suggesting that the sulfhydryl group also played a role in the copper chelating properties. (C) 2006 Swiss Society of Food Science and Technology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据