4.8 Article

213Bi (α-emitter)-antibody targeting of breast cancer metastases in the neu-N transgenic mouse model

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 68, 期 10, 页码 3873-3880

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6308

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA113797-03, R01 CA113797] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Treatment failure in breast cancer is largely the failure to control metastatic dissemination. in this study, we investigated the efficacy of an antibody against the rat variant of HER-2/neu, labeled with the alpha-particle emitter Bi-213 to treat widespread metastases in a rat/neu transgenic mouse model of metastatic mammary carcinoma. The model manifests wide-spread dissemination or tumor cells leading to osteolytic bone lesions and liver metastases, common sites of clinical metastases. The maximum tolerated dose was 120 mu Ci of Bi-213-7.16.4. The kinetics of marrow suppression and subsequent recovery were determined. Three days after left cardiac ventricular injection of 10(5) rat HER-2/neu-expressing syngeneic tumor cells, neu-N mice were treated with (a) 120 mu Ci Bi-213-7.16.4, (b) 90 mu Ci Bi-213-7.16.4, (c) 120 mu Ci Bi-213-Rituximab (unreactive control), and (d) unlabeled 7.16.4. Treatment with 120 mu Ci Bi-213-7.16.4 increased median survival time to 41 days compared with 28 days for the untreated controls (P < 0.0001); corresponding median survival times for groups b, c, and d were 36 (P < 0.001), 31 (P < 0.01), and 33 (P = 0.05) days, respectively. Median survival relative to controls was not significantly improved in mice injected with 10-fold less cells or with multiple courses of treatment. We concluded that alpha-emitter Bi-213-labeled monoclonal antibody targeting the HER-2/neu antigen was effective in treating early-stage HER-2/neu-expressing micrometastases. Analysis of the results suggests that further gains in efficacy may require higher specific activity constructs or target antigens that are more highly expressed on tumor cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据