4.8 Article

Functions of anti-MAGE T-cells induced in melanoma patients under different vaccination modalities

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 68, 期 10, 页码 3931-3940

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5898

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumor regressions have been observed in a small proportion of melanoma patients vaccinated with a MAGE-A3 peptide presented by HLA-A1, administered as peptide, ALVAC canarypox virus containing a MAGE-A3 minigene, or peptide-pulsed dendritic cells (DC). There was a correlation between tumor regression and the detection of anti-MAGE-3.A1 CTL responses. These responses were monoclonal and often of a very low magnitude after vaccination with peptide or ALVAC, and usually polyclonal and of a higher magnitude after DC vaccination. These results suggested that, at least in some patients, surprisingly few anti-MAGE-3.A1 T-cells could initiate a tumor regression process. To understand the role of these T cells, we carried out a functional analysis of anti-MAGE-3.A1 CTL clones derived from vaccinated patients who displayed tumor regression. The functional avidities of these CTL clones, evaluated in lysis assays, were surprisingly low, suggesting that high avidity was not part of the putative capability of these CTL to trigger tumor rejection. Most anti-MAGE-3.A1 CTL clones obtained after DC vaccination, but not after peptide or ALVAC vaccination, produced interleukin 10. Transcript profiling confirmed these results and indicated that approximately 20 genes, including CD40L, prostaglandin D2 synthase, granzyme K, and granzyme H, were highly differentially expressed between the anti-MAGE-3.A1 CTL clones derived from patients vaccinated with either peptide-ALVAC or peptide-pulsed DC. These results indicate that the modality of vaccination with a tumor-specific antigen influences the differentiation pathway of the antivaccine CD8 T-cells, which may have an effect on their capacity to trigger a tumor rejection response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据