4.8 Article

Centrosomal PKCβII and pericentrin are critical for human prostate cancer growth and angiogenesis

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 68, 期 16, 页码 6831-6839

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6195

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [CA09151]
  2. Department of Health and Human Services

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Angiogenesis is critical in the progression of prostate cancer. However, the interplay between the proliferation kinetics of tumor endothelial cells (angiogenesis) and tumor cells has not been investigated. Also, protein kinase C (PKC) regulates various aspects of tumor cell growth, but its role in prostate cancer has not been investigated in detail. Here, we found that the proliferation rates of endothelial and tumor cells oscillate asynchronously during the growth of human prostate cancer xenografts. Furthermore, our analyses suggest that PKC beta II was activated during increased angiogenesis and that PKC beta II plays a key role in the proliferation of endothelial cells and tumor cells in human prostate cancer; treatment with a PKC beta II-selective inhibitor, beta IIV5-3, reduced angiogenesis and tumor cell proliferation. We also find a unique effect of PKC beta II inhibition on normalizing pericentrin (a protein regulating cytokinesis), especially in endothelial cells as well as in tumor cells. PKC beta II inhibition reduced the level and mislocalization of pericentrin and normalized microtubule organization in the tumor endothelial cells. Although pericentrin has been known to be up-regulated in epithelial cells of prostate cancers, its level in tumor endothelium has not been studied in detail. We found that pericentrin is up-regulated in human tumor endothelium compared with endothelium adjacent to normal glands in tissues from prostate cancer patients. Our results suggest that a PKC beta II inhibitor such as beta IIV5-3 may be used to reduce prostate cancer growth by targeting both angiogenesis and tumor cell growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据