4.8 Article

Identification of a small molecule with synthetic lethality for K-ras and protein kinase C iota

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 68, 期 18, 页码 7403-7408

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1449

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [R01 CA 092487, R01 CA 098582]
  2. Specialized Programs of Research Excellence [CA 70907]
  3. Cancer Center Support [CA 16672]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

K-Ras mutations are frequently found in various cancers and are associated with resistance to treatment or poor prognosis. Similarly, poor outcomes have recently been observed in cancer patients with overexpression of protein kinase C iota (PKCL), an atypical protein kinase C that is activated by oncogenic Ras protein and is required for K-Ras-induced transformation and colonic carcinogenesis in vivo. Thus far, there is no effective agent for treatment of cancers with K-Ras mutations or PKCL overexpression. By synthetic lethality screening, we identified a small compound (designated oncrasin-1) that effectively kills various human lung cancer cells with K-Ras mutations at low or submicromolar concentrations. The cytotoxic effects correlated with apoptosis induction, as was evidenced by increase of apoptotic cells and activation of caspase-3 and caspase-8 upon the treatment of oncrasin-1 in sensitive cells. Treatment with oncrasin-1 also led to abnormal aggregation of PKCL in the nucleus of sensitive cells but not in resistant cells. Furthermore, oncrasin-induced apoptosis was blocked by siRNA of K-Ras or PKCL, suggesting that oncrasin-1 is targeted to a novel K-Ras/PKCL pathway. The in vivo administration of oncrasin-1 suppressed the growth of K-ras mutant human lung tumor xenografts by > 70% and prolonged the survival of nude mice bearing these tumors, without causing detectable toxicity. Our results indicate that oncrasin-1 or its active analogues could be a novel class of anticancer agents, which effectively kill K-Ras mutant cancer cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据