4.8 Article

A syngeneic variance library for functional annotation of human variation:: Application to BRCA2

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 68, 期 13, 页码 5023-5030

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6189

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 AG000511-10] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCI NIH HHS [CA88843, CA62924, P50 CA062924, P50 CA088843] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The enormous scope of natural human genetic variation is now becoming defined. To accurately annotate these variants, and to identify those with clinical importance, is often difficult to assess through functional assays. We explored systematic annotation by using homologous recombination to modify a native gene in hemizygous (wt/Delta exon) human cancer cells, generating a novel syngeneic variance library (SyVaL). We created a SyVaL of BRCA2 variants: nondeleterious, proposed deleterious, deleterious, and of uncertain significance. We found that the null states BRCA2(Delta ex11/Delta ex11) and BRCA2(Delta ex11/Y3308X) were deleterious as assessed by a loss of RAD51 focus formation on genotoxic damage and by acquisition of toxic hypersensitivity to mitomycin C and etoposide, whereas BRCA2(Delta ex11/Y3308Y), BRCA2(Delta ex11/P3292L) ,and BRCA2(Delta ex11/P3280H) had wild-type function. A proposed phosphorylation site at codon 3291 affecting function was confirmed by substitution of an acidic residue (glutamate, BRCA2(Delta ex11/S3291E)) for the native serine, but in contrast to a prior report, phosphorylation was dispensable (alanine, BRCA2(Delta ex11/S3291A)) for BRCA2-governed cellular phenotypes. These results show that SyVaLs offer a means to comprehensively annotate gene function, facilitating numerical and unambiguous readouts. SyVaLs may be especially useful for genes in which functional assays using exogenous expression are toxic or otherwise unreliable. They also offer a stable, distributable cellular resource for further research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据