4.4 Article

Retention of KOH-soluble fluoride on enamel and dentine under erosive conditions - A comparison of in vitro and in situ results

期刊

ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY
卷 52, 期 1, 页码 9-14

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.07.004

关键词

fluoride; erosion; dentine; enamel

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Aim of the study was to investigate the stability of CaF2-like precipitates on enamel and dentine under neutral or acidic conditions and to compare in vitro and in situ results. Methods: Human enamel and dentine specimens were fluoridated (Elmex fluid, 5 min) and subjected to erosive demineralisation (Sprite light: 3/day each; 30 s in vitro, 2 min in situ) or stored under neutral conditions for 4 (in vitro) or 7 (in situ) days. KOH-soluble fluoride was determined using an ion selective electrode. Between the acid attacks, specimens were stored in remineralisation solution (in vitro) or retained in the oral cavity (four volunteers for enamel and dentine each). Results: Initially, high amounts of KOH-soluble fluoride were gained (between 77.9 +/- 12.3 and 96.0 +/- 46.4 mu g/cm(2)). Under neutral conditions in vitro, a significant decrease on enamel (16.2 +/- 5.0 mu g/cm(2)) and dentine (18.6 +/- 10.5 mu g/cm(2)) was found, which was more severe under acidic conditions (6.3 +/- 3.0 and 5.1 +/- 2.1 mu g/cm(2), respectively). Under in situ conditions, KOH-soluble fluoride was strikingly stable on enamel under neutral (42.3 +/- 12.6 mu g/cm(2)) as well as under acidic conditions (54.1 +/- 17.4 mu g/cm(2)). On dentine, the dissolution kinetics of KOH-soluble fluoride was similar to the in vitro conditions, but the loss was less severe (45.3 +/- 12.9 mu g/cm(2) under neutral and 8.8 +/- 6.4 mu g/cm(2) under acidic conditions). Conclusions: in vitro, more KOH-soluble fluoride was lost under erosive compared to neutral conditions. The intra-oral environment was considerably protective for CaF2-like precipitates especially on enamel. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据