4.5 Article

Application of the multicellular tumour spheroid model to screen PET tracers for analysis of early response of chemotherapy in breast cancer

期刊

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/bcr1747

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction Positron emission tomography ( PET) is suggested for early monitoring of treatment response, assuming that effective anticancer treatment induces metabolic changes that precede morphology alterations and changes in growth. The aim of this study was to introduce multicellular tumour spheroids (MTS) to study the effect of anticancer drugs and suggest an appropriate PET tracer for further studies. Methods MTS of the breast cancer cell line MCF7 were exposed to doxorubicin, paclitaxel, docetaxel, tamoxifen or imatinib for 7 days for growth pattern studies and for 3 or 5 days for PET tracer studies. The effect on growth was computed using the semi-automated size determination method ( SASDM). The effect on the uptake of PET tracers [F-18] 3'-deoxy-3'-fluorothymidine ( FLT), [ 1- C-11] acetate ( ACE), [ C-11] choline ( CHO), [ C-11] methionine ( MET), and 2-[ F-18] fluoro- 2deoxyglucose ( FDG) was calculated in form of uptake/viable volume of the MTS at the end of the drug exposures, and finally the uptake was related to effects on growth rate. Results The drugs paclitaxel, docetaxel and doxorubicin gave severe growth inhibition, which correlated well with inhibition of the FLT uptake. FLT had, compared with ACE, CHO, MET and FDG, higher sensitivity in monitoring the therapy effects. Conclusion SASDM provides an effective, user-friendly, timesaving and accurate method to record the growth pattern of the MTS, and also to calculate the effect of the drug on PET tracer uptake. This study demonstrate the use of MTS and SASDM in combination with PET tracers as a promising approach to probe and select PET tracer for treatment monitoring of anticancer drugs and that can hopefully be applied for optimisation in breast cancer treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据