4.6 Article

Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods

期刊

DENTAL MATERIALS
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 45-50

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.040

关键词

Cercon; zirconia ceramic; composite resin; tensile bond strength; surface conditions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives. The purpose of this in vitro study was the evaluation of the bond strength and its durability of two composite resins to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods. Methods. Plexiglas tubes filled with composite resin were bonded to zirconia ceramic discs (Cercon) which were either in their original state as supplied by the manufacturer only cleaned in isopropanol or were cleaned with an air-powder-water spray with sodium hydrocarbonate solution or were air abraded (50 mu m Al2O3). Groups of 20 specimens each were bonded either with a conventional composite resin (Variolink II) or with a phosphate monomer (MDP) -containing resin (Panavia F) to the ceramic discs. Subgroups of 10 bonded specimens were stored in distilled water (37 degrees C) for either 3 days or for 150 days. Additionally, the 150 days specimens were thermal cycled 37,500 times. Statistical analyses were conducted with the Wilcoxon rank sum test adjusted by Bonferroni-Holm. Results. The initial tensile bond strength (TBS) for Variolink II ranged from 9.0 to 16.6 MPa and were significantly lower (p <= 0.05) than for Panavia F ranging from 18.7 to 45.0 MPa. Air abrasion resulted in significantly higher TBS (p <= 0.01) than the two other surface conditioning methods. After 150 days storage, only the air abraded specimens bonded with Panavia F showed high bond strengths of 39.2 MPa, whereas most other specimens debonded spontaneously or showed very low bond strengths. Significance. The use of the MDP-containing composite resin Panavia F on air abraded zirconia ceramic can be recommended as promising bonding method. (C) 2005 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据