4.5 Review

Microcirculatory function monitoring at the bedside - a view from the intensive care

期刊

PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT
卷 28, 期 9, 页码 R65-R86

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/28/9/R01

关键词

gastric tonometry; laser Doppler flowmetry; venous occlusion plethysmography; near-infrared spectrophotometry; tissue reflectance spectrophotometry; orthogonal polarization spectral imaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microcirculatory dysfunction plays a key role in the pathophysiology of various disease states and may consequently impact patient outcome. Until recently, the evaluation of the microcirculation using different measurement techniques has been mostly limited to animal and human research. With technical advances, microcirculatory monitoring nowadays becomes more and more available for application in clinical praxis. Unfortunately, measurements within the microcirculation are mostly limited to easily accessible surfaces, such as skin, muscle and tongue. Due to major differences in the physiologic regulation of microcirculatory blood flow and in metabolism between organs and even within different tissues in one organ, the clinical importance of regional microcirculatory measurements remains to be determined. In addition, technical methods available demonstrate large differences in the measured parameters and sampling volume, making interpretation of data even more difficult. Nonetheless, the monitoring of the microcirculation may, ahead of time, alert physicians that tissue oxygen supply becomes compromised and it may lead to a better understanding of basic pathophysiological aspects of disease. In the present review, we describe available non-invasive microcirculatory measurement techniques which can be applied clinically at the bedside. After a short discussion of physiologic and pathophysiologic basics related to microcirculatory monitoring, the measuring principles, applications, strengths and limitations of different monitoring systems are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据