4.6 Article

Diatom communities, lithofacies characteristics and paleo environmental interpretation of Pliocene diatomite deposits in the lhlara-Selime plain (Aksaray, Central Anatolia, Turkey)

期刊

JOURNAL OF ASIAN EARTH SCIENCES
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 170-180

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseaes.2006.07.015

关键词

Central Anatolia; diatomite; Ihlara-Selime plain; lacustrine deposits; palaeoenvironment; Pliocene; Turkey

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present investigation uses palaeontological, sedimentological, mineralogical and chemical analyses of diatom-bearing lacustrine deposits to determine the palaeoenvironmental history of the Pliocene-age of the Ihlara-Selime plain in the western part of the Cappadocia Volcanic Province. The diatomite is composed of amorphous silica, opal, cristobalite, quartz, feldspar and montmorillonite. Chemical analyses show that diatomite is comprised of SiO2 85.05%, Al2O3 5.30%, Fe2O3 1.22%, CaO 0.12%, MgO 0.58%, Na2O 1.52% and K2O 0.22%. The high SiO2 content of Ihlara-Selime plain diatomite is highly conspicuous, as it could be predicted. Six horizons comprised of diatomite, palaeosols, limestone, massive conglomerate, massive calcrete, and trough-cross bedded sandstone describe the associated lithofacies (A-F). Twenty-five species were identified belonging to 20 diatom genera, from the analysis of 24 samples from three excavated sections of diatomite. The fossil diatom assemblages are mainly comprised of freshwater, epipelic, mesotrophic, mesosaprophic and alkaline forms. The flora is dominated by benthic species with very low abundance of planktonic species, indicating that the diatomite of the area under study was deposited in a shallow, silicate rich, alkaline and mesotrophic freshwater lake. Water levels, nutrient content, water temperature and alkalinity fluctuated through time. In addition, there was a difference between section one, and sections two and three locations in terms of the deposition conditions. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据