4.5 Review

Beyond heparin and warfarin: the new generation of anticoagulants

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 271-282

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1517/13543784.16.3.271

关键词

anticoagulants; arterial thromboembolism; direct thrombin inhibitors; Factor Xa inhibitors; pentasaccharides; venous thromboembolism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heparin and warfarin are widely used for the prevention and treatment of venous and arterial thromboembolism. Although effective, both agents have important limitations; for example, both drugs must be monitored, which is inconvenient for patients and for physicians. Heparin requires parenteral administration and can cause heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, an immune-mediated process that can lead to life-threatening thrombosis. Warfarin also has its limitations. Due to its slow onset of action, warfarin must be overlapped with heparin (or another rapidly acting anticoagulant) when treating patients with established thrombosis or who are at high risk for thrombosis. Warfarin dosing is variable because its activity is influenced by dietary intake of vitamin K, genetic polymorphisms in enzymes that are involved in its metabolism and numerous drug-drug interactions that promote or reduce its activity. New anticoagulants have been developed to overcome these problems. Building on a better understanding of coagulation pathways, advances in structure-based drug design and information derived from natural anticoagulants isolated from hematophagous organisms, most of the new anticoagulants target specific coagulation enzymes. Focussing on drugs that have at least completed Phase II evaluation, this article briefly reviews the coagulation pathways and its natural regulators; outlines the limitations of existing anticoagulants and identifies the opportunities for new ones; highlights the properties of selected new anticoagulants; describes the clinical trial results with these agents; and provides a perspective on their potential strengths and weaknesses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据