3.8 Article

Herbicide use, productivity, and nitrogen fixation in field pea (Pisum sativum)

期刊

AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH
卷 58, 期 12, 页码 1204-1214

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/AR06394

关键词

nodulation; crop yellowing; N-2 xation; southern Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Grain legumes grown in low-rainfall (< 300 mm per annum) cropping regions of southern Australia have at times failed to provide the rotational benefits observed in other regions, such as improved cereal yields in the season following a legume. 'In-crop' herbicides were identified as one possible factor that may have been negatively affecting the legume-rhizobia symbiosis. To test this hypothesis and identify possible mechanisms behind any observed effects, field trials were conducted at Waikerie (South Australia) in 2001, 2003, and 2004. Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) was grown and treated with one of several herbicides 5 weeks after sowing. Crop yellowing, biomass, nodulation, and nitrogen (N-2)fixation were assessed 3 weeks after spraying, and biomass, yield, percent nitrogen derived from fixation (%Ndfa), and N-2 fixation (2003, 2004) were assessed at the end of the season. Some herbicides stunted plant growth and caused crop yellowing 3 weeks after application; however, none of the herbicides affected N nutrition of peas. Despite this, in 2003, half of the herbicides assessed reduced the %Ndfa by 34-60% relative to unsprayed control plots. Herbicide effects on the measured parameters followed similar trends over each year of the 3-year study. However, effects were rarely significant in 2004 as the trials were primarily affected by low rainfall, indicating that environmental parameters play a key role in determining the severity of herbicide effects on symbiotic N-2 fixation. The possible mechanisms behind herbicide-induced damage to the pea-rhizobium symbiosis are discussed, including reduced photosynthetic capacity of plants exposed to herbicides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据