4.5 Article

Source and significance of selected polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments (Hovea-3 well, Perth Basin, Western Australia) spanning the Permian-Triassic boundary

期刊

ORGANIC GEOCHEMISTRY
卷 38, 期 11, 页码 1795-1803

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2007.07.001

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stable carbon isotopic data for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs; chrysene and triphenylene, benzo(e)pyrene, 9-methylphenanthrene) in sediments of comparable thermal maturity from a petroleum drill core (Hovea-3 well, Perth Basin, Western Australia) spanning the largest mass extinction event in the past 500 million years (Permian-Triassic boundary) are consistent with an algal kerogen source in the basal Triassic as opposed to a combustion and/or higher-plant source in the underlying Permian sediments. The delta C-13 values of extractable PAHs are less negative in the Permian inertinitic interval (-24.7 parts per thousand to -29.27 parts per thousand) than the Triassic sapropelic interval (-30 parts per thousand. to -33.37 parts per thousand). A strong correlation is evident between delta C-13 of individual PAHs, delta C-13 of kerogen and Rock-Eval pyrolysis hydrogen index providing unequivocal evidence that PAH delta C-13 is mainly controlled by organic matter type. Abundant algal-derived PAHs in basal Triassic sediments may be a global feature; the lack of coal globally in the basal Triassic sediments is also consistent with this observation. The Early Triassic coal gap appears to coincide with the global extinction of peat-forming plants at the end of the Permian, coal did not reappear until the Middle Triassic and Permian levels of plant diversity and thick peat deposits did not recover until the Late Triassic. The PAH isotopic data support the contention that a global anoxic at the end of the Permian period contributed to the gradual worldwide asphyxiation and ultimate extinction of many marine and terrigenous organisms. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据