4.5 Article

Belief about drug assignment and abstinence in treatment of cigarette smoking using nortriptyline

期刊

NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 467-471

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1080/14622200701239480

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA015732, K05DA016752, P50DA009253, R01DA002538] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [DA009253, DA015732, DA016752, DA002538] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the relationship between beliefs about drug assignment and abstinence status in two treatment studies using nortriptyline hydrochloride as an adjunct to smoking cessation. Smokers ( N=345) drawn from two clinical trials were asked at the final follow-up ( FFU) at 52 or 64 weeks whether they believed they had received active or placebo drug. Responses were obtained from 262 participants, or 76% of the sample. Biochemically verified abstinence was collected at end of treatment ( EOT) and FFU. In both studies, participants were correct in guessing drug assignment. At FFU, belief about drug assignment was not related to abstinence for either active or placebo participants. Participants who received active drug and who were smoking at EOT were more likely to believe they had received placebo than active drug participants who were abstinent at EOT. We found no significant relationship between belief about drug and abstinence status for placebo participants at EOT. Baseline variables did not significantly predict correctness of drug identification. Participants who experienced drug side-effects not easily attributable to nicotine withdrawal were more likely to identify their drug assignment as nortriptyline. We conclude that experience during the active treatment period, including side-effects and treatment success, may be related to belief about drug assignment, that the field would be well served by at least two assessments of blindness in clinical trials, and that discrepancy between these findings and those regarding nicotine replacement therapy may be related to differences in dependent variables.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据