4.5 Article

The Relationship Between Light Exposure and Sleep, Fatigue, and Depression in Cancer Outpatients Test of the Mediating Effect

期刊

CANCER NURSING
卷 37, 期 5, 页码 382-390

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000106

关键词

Cancer; Depression; Fatigue; Light exposure; Sleep

资金

  1. Taipei Medical University Hospital [98TMU-TMUH-05-4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Light is an important cue for the entrainment of circadian rhythms, which can be related to sleep quality, fatigue, and depression in cancer patients. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of light exposure on sleep quality, fatigue, and depression in cancer patients, to test whether the effect of light exposure on sleep quality, fatigue, and depression was mediated by the other 2 symptoms. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study for which we recruited 163 cancer outpatients. For 3 consecutive days, they wore an Actiwatch to measure light exposure. Instruments included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index-Taiwan form, the Brief Fatigue Inventory-Taiwan form, and the Beck Depression Inventory II-Taiwan version. Results: The results indicated that the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index-Taiwan form score was significantly and negatively correlated with minutes of light exposure (MLE) of 1000 lux or greater (r = -0.61, P < .001) and the intensity of light exposure under activity (r = -0.59, P < .001). Fatigue was negatively correlated with MLE (r = -0.18, P = .03). Depression was also negatively correlated with MLE and intensity of light exposure (both r = -0.18, P = .02). Most important, the effect of light exposure on sleep quality, fatigue, and depression was mediated by the other 2 symptoms. Conclusion: Light exposure appeared to be a shared factor for the co-occurrence of fatigue, sleep disturbances, and depression. Implications for Practice: Light exposure has great potential for improving sleep quality as well as ameliorating fatigue and depression in cancer outpatients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据