4.5 Article

Influence of age and pubertal status on substrate utilization during exercise with and without carbohydrate intake in healthy boys

期刊

APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY NUTRITION AND METABOLISM
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 416-425

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING, NRC RESEARCH PRESS
DOI: 10.1139/H07-004

关键词

children; cycling; energy metabolism; stable isotope tracers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Substrate utilization during exercise is known to differ between children and adults, but whether these differences are related to pubertal status is unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of pubertal status on endogenous (CHOendo) and orally ingested exogenous (CHOexo) carbohydrate and fat oxidation rates during exercise. Twenty boys at the same chronological age (12 y) were divided into three pubertal groups (pre-pubertal, PP: n = 7; early-pubertal, EP: n = 7; mid- to late-pubertal, M-LP: n = 6) and consumed either a placebo or C-13-enriched 6% CHO drink while cycling for 60 min at similar to 70% of their maximal aerobic power (VO2 max). Another group of 14-year-old boys (pubertal, n = 9) completed all procedures. Substrate utilization was calculated for the final 15 min of exercise using indirect calorimetry and stable isotope methodology. CHOexo decreased fat (p < 0.001) and increased total CHO (p < 0.001) oxidation, irrespective of group. Fat oxidation was higher (p = 0.01) in younger boys than in older boys, but similar (p >= 0.33) among PP, EP, and M-LP boys. CHOexo contributed to similar to 30% of energy expenditure (EE) in PP and EP, but to only 24% in M-LP (p = 0.02), which was identical to the older boys (24%). CHOexo oxidation rate as a percentage of EE was inversely related to testosterone levels (r = -0.51, p = 0.005, n = 29). It was concluded that reliance on CHOexo during exercise is particularly sensitive to pubertal status, with the highest oxidation rates observed in pre- and early-pubertal boys, independent of chronological age.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据