4.5 Article

Deeper snow enhances winter respiration from both plant-associated and bulk soil carbon pools in birch hummock tundra

期刊

ECOSYSTEMS
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 419-431

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-007-9033-z

关键词

climate change; winter; snow; soil; tundra; birch; arctic; respiration; carbon dioxide; temperature; Canada

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has only recently become apparent that biological activity during winter in seasonally snow-covered ecosystems may exert a significant influence on biogeochemical cycling and ecosystem function. One-seventh of the global soil carbon pool is stored in the bulk soil component of arctic ecosystems. Consistent climate change predictions of substantial increases in winter air temperatures and snow depths for the Arctic indicate that this region may become a significant net annual source of CO2 to the atmosphere if its bulk soil carbon is decomposed. We used snow fences to investigate the influence of a moderate increase in snow depth from approximately 0.3 m (ambient) to approximately 1 m on winter carbon dioxide fluxes from mesic birch hummock tundra in northern Canada. We differentiated fluxes derived from the bulk soil and plant-associated carbon pools using an experimental 'weeding' manipulation. Increased snow depth enhanced the wintertime carbon flux from both pools, strongly suggesting that respiration from each was sensitive to warmer soil temperatures. Furthermore, deepened snow resulted in cooler and relatively stable soil temperatures during the spring-thaw period, as well as delayed and fewer freeze-thaw cycles. The snow fence treatment increased mean total winter efflux from 27 to 43 g CO2-C m(-2) . Because total 2004 growing season net ecosystem exchange for this site is estimated at 29-37 g CO2-C m(-2), our results strongly suggest that a moderate increase in snow depth can enhance winter respiration sufficiently to switch the ecosystem annual net carbon exchange from a sink to source, resulting in net CO2 release to the atmosphere.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据