期刊
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY
卷 60, 期 3, 页码 291-309出版社
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17470210601000581
关键词
-
资金
- Economic and Social Research Council [RES-538-28-1001] Funding Source: researchfish
A major topic within human learning, the field of contingency judgement, began to emerge about 25 years ago following publication of an article on depressive realism by Alloy and Abramson (1979). Subsequently, associationism has been the dominant theoretical framework for understanding contingency learning but this has been challenged in recent years by an alternative cognitive or inferential approach. This article outlines the key conceptual differences between these approaches and summarizes some of the main methods that have been employed to distinguish between them.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据