4.7 Article

An in vitro retinoblastoma human triple culture model of angiogenesis: A modulatory effect of TGF-β

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 354, 期 1, 页码 181-188

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.08.004

关键词

Retinoblastoma; Human retinal microvascular endothelial cells; Human retinal microvascular pericytes; TGF-beta; Cytosolic and calcium-independent PLA(2)

类别

资金

  1. [2009-BM7LJC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Retinoblastoma is the most common intraocular tumour in children. In view of understanding the molecular mechanisms through which angiogenic switch on happens in the early phases of reciprocal interaction between tumour and cells constituting retinal microvessel, Transwell co-cultures constituted by human retinal endothelial cells (HREC), pericytes (HRPC), and human retinoblastoma cell line Y-79 were performed. Y-79 enhanced HREC proliferation, reduced by the introduction of HRPC in triple culture. In HREC/HRPC cultures, TGF-beta in media increased, decreasing in triple cultures. High VEGF levels in triple cultures witnessed the establishment of a strongly in vitro angiogenic environment. Y-79 induced in HREC an increase in c- and iPLA(2), phospho-cPLA(2), inducible COX-2 protein expressions, PLA(2) activities and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) release. These effects were attenuated when HRPC were introduced in triple culture. Moreover, antibody silencing of TGF-beta demonstrated a strong correlation between the signalling pathway triggered by TGF-beta of pericytal origin and the phospholipase activation and the modulation of PGE2 release. Inhibiting VEGFA effect, the HRPC loss in triple culture decreased, showing its modulatory effect on their survival. Relying on the data here presented, sustaining the pericytal survival in a tumour retinal environment could ensure the integrity of microvessels and the TGF-beta supply, essential for controlling aberrant endothelial pruning and angiogenesis. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据