4.0 Review

Congo red and protein aggregation in neurodegenerative diseases

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS
卷 53, 期 1, 页码 135-160

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.08.001

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; amyloid; complement; Congo red; glycosaminoglycan; Huntington's disease; imaging probe; inclusion; microglia; Parkinson's disease; prion disease; protein configuration

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R21NS043717] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [1 R21 NS043717-01A1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Congo red is a commonly used histological dye for amyloid detection. The specificity of this staining results from Congo red's affinity for binding to fibril proteins enriched in beta-sheet conformation. Unexpectedly, recent investigations indicate that the dye also possesses the capacity to interfere with processes of protein misfolding and aggregation, stabilizing native protein monomers or partially folded intermediates, while reducing concentration of more toxic protein oligomers. Inhibitory effects of Congo red upon amyloid toxicity may also range from blockade of channel formation and interference with glycosaminoglycans binding or immune functions, to the modulation of gene expression. Particularly, Congo red exhibits ameliorative effect in models of neuro degenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, Huntington's and prion diseases. Another interesting application of Congo red analogues is the development of imaging probes. Based on their small molecular size and penetrability through blood-brain barrier, Congo red congeners can be used for both antemortem and in vivo visualization and quantification of brain amyloids. Therefore, understanding mechanisms involved in dye-amyloidal fibril binding and inhibition of aggregation will provide instructive guides for the design of future compounds, potentially useful for monitoring and treating neuro degenerative diseases. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据