4.3 Article

Evaluation of GERD symptoms during therapy Part II. Psychometric evaluation and validation of the new questionnaire ReQuest (TM) in erosive GERD

期刊

DIGESTION
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 41-47

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000101081

关键词

gastroesophageal reflux disease; gastrointestinal symptom rating scale; psychological general well-being scale; outcome measure; symptom assessment, GERD; treatment response, pantoprazole; ReQuest (TM) validity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Evaluation of the response of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms to treatment would be facilitated by a brief, valid, reliable and responsive, self-assessed GERD-sensitive scale. We therefore developed the Reflux Questionnaire (ReQuest (TM)). This publication describes the psychometric evaluation and validation of ReQuest (TM). Methods: This second phase of development was based on data from a clinical trial of patients with erosive GERD who received pantoprazole 20 or 40 mg daily for 28 days and completed weekly the long, and daily the short version of ReQuest (TM). The psychometric analyses of ReQuest (TM) included internal consistency, test-retest reliability and responsiveness. Construct validity was evaluated by comparison with the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and the Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) scale. Results: Validation of ReQuest TM indicated very high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90) and test- retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.94 (long- long) and 0.86 short-short)). This was also the case for the two subscales ReQuest (TM) -GI and ReQuest (TM)-WSO with Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.84 and 0.81. Responsiveness was high with a responsiveness index of > 0.8 at day 28. Construct validity was good. Conclusion: ReQuest (TM) is a highly reliable, valid and responsive self- assessment tool for evaluating treatment response in patients with erosive GERD, and can be applied daily.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据