4.7 Review

Viruses and human cancer: From detection to causality

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 305, 期 2, 页码 218-227

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.09.011

关键词

Virus discovery; Cancer viruses; Causality; Epstein-Barr virus, EBV; Hepatitis B virus, HBV; Human papillomavirus, HPV; Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1, HTLV-1; Hepatitis C virus HCV; Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus; KSHV; Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV)

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA096512-06, R01 CA124332-05, R01 CA132637-04, R01 CA096512-07, R01 CA132637, R01 CA124332-04, R01 CA124332, R01 CA132637-03] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study of cancer is incomplete without taking into consideration of tumorigenic viruses. Initially, searches for human cancer viruses were fruitless despite an expansion of our knowledge in the same period concerning acute-transforming retroviruses in animals. However, over the last 40 years, we have witnessed rapid progress in the tumor virology field. Currently, acknowledged human cancer viruses include Epstein-Barr virus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, high-risk human papilloma viruses. human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 and Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus. Extensive epidemiological and mechanistic studies have led to the development of novel preventive and therapeutic approaches for managing some of these infections and associated cancers. In addition, recent advances in molecular technologies have enabled the discovery of a new potential human tumor virus, Merkel cell polyomavirus, but its association with cancer remains to be validated. It is anticipated that in the next few decades many additional human cancer viruses will be discovered and the mechanisms underlying viral oncogenesis delineated. Thus, it can be expected that better tools for preventing and treating virus-associated cancer will be available in the near future. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据