4.7 Article

HSV-tk expressing mesenchymal stem cells exert bystander effect on human glioblastoma cells

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 290, 期 1, 页码 58-67

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.08.028

关键词

Human glioblastoma; Mesenchymal stem cells; Cellular delivery; Herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase; Gap junctions

类别

资金

  1. VEGA [2/7060/27, 2/0119/08]
  2. APVV [APVV-0260-07]
  3. FIDURA Capital Consult GmbH, Munich
  4. SPP Foundation
  5. League against Cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previously we have reported adipose-tissue derived human mesenchymal stem cells (AT-MSC) as cellular delivery vehicles for tumor-targeted cancer gene therapy. In this report we aimed to determine whether Herpes simplex virus - thymidine kinase (HSV-tk) expressing AT-MSC (TK-MSC) could exert cytotoxic effect on tumor cells upon treatment with prodrug ganciclovir (GCV). Direct co-cultures of human glioblastoma cells 8-MG-BA, 42-MG-BA and U-118 MG with TK-MSC/GCV resulted in substantial viability decrease in vitro. This therapeutic paradigm was most efficient against 8-MG-BA glioblastoma cells exhibiting cytotoxicity (>50%) in the presence of TK-MSC and 0.1 mu M GCV. Rapid apoptosis induction in three glioblastoma cell lines and TK-MSC demonstrated both bystander cytotoxic effect on tumor cells and GCV conversion-mediated suicide effect on TK-MSC. Furthermore, we were able to demonstrate formation of gap junctions between AT-MSC and human glioblastoma cells as a mechanism contributing to bystander cytotoxicity. Inability of human HeLa and MCF7 to form gap junctions with AT-MSC rendered these cell refractory to the TK-MSC/GCV mediated cytotoxicity. Gap junction intercellular communication (GJIC) capability of AT-MSC with tumor cells further supports the exploitation of mesenchymal stem cells for approaches relying on the bystander effect. Biological consequences of these capabilities remain to be further explored. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据