4.6 Review

Geological dates and molecular rates: Rapid divergence of rivers and their biotas

期刊

SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY
卷 56, 期 2, 页码 271-282

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1080/10635150701313855

关键词

biogeography; calibrations; coalescent; fish; freshwater; geomorphology; geology; molecular clock; mutation rate; palaeogeography; pleistocene; purifying selection; refugia; time dependency; vicariance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We highlight a novel molecular clock calibration system based on geologically dated river reversal and river capture events. Changes in drainage pattern may effect vicariant isolation of freshwater taxa, and thus provide a predictive framework for associated phylogeographic study. As a case in point, New Zealand's Pelorus and Kaituna rivers became geologically isolated from the larger Wairau River system 70 to 130 kyr BP. We conducted mitochondrial DNA phylogeographic analyses of two unrelated freshwater-limited fish taxa native to these river systems (Gobiomorphus breviceps, n = 63; Galaxias divergens, n = 95). Phylogenetic analysis of combined control region and cytochrome b sequences yielded reciprocally monophyletic clades of Pelorus-Kaituna and Wairau haplotypes for each species. Calibrated rates of molecular change based on this freshwater vicariant event are substantially faster than traditionally accepted rates for fishes but consistent with other recent inferences based on geologically young calibration points. A survey of freshwater phylogeographic literature reveals numerous examples in which the ages of recent evolutionary events may have been substantially overestimated through the use of accepted calibrations. We recommend that-wherever possible-biologists should start to reassess the conclusions of such studies by using more appropriate molecular calibrations derived from recent geological events. [Biogeography; calibrations; coalescent; fish; freshwater; geomorphology; geology; molecular clock; mutation rate; palaeogeography; Pleistocene; purifying selection; refugia; time dependency; vicariance].

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据