4.3 Article

SLAP tears of the glenoid labrum in contact athletes

期刊

CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 1-4

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31802ede87

关键词

SLAP; rugby; contact

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To describe the distribution and clinical presentation of labral injuries in rugby players and the time taken for them to return to sports. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Busy shoulder practice in the North West of England, treating a large number of professional athletes. Patients: A review of 51 shoulder arthroscopies performed on professional rugby players over a 35 month period. All patients diagnosed with a SLAP lesion at arthroscopy were identified. Eighteen patients had a documented SLAP tear; this group represented our study population. Interventions: Arthroscopic debridement and/or stabilization was carried out for all labral injuries using Panaloc anchors and No. 2 PDS via a 2 portal technique. Main Outcome Measurements: Classification of injury; Satisfaction, Time to return to play. Results: The incidence of SLAP tears in our study population was 35%. There were 11 isolated SLAP tears (61%), 3 SLAP tears associated with a Bankart lesion (17%), 2 SLAP tears associated with a posterior labral lesion (11%), and 2 SLAP tears associated with an anterior and posterior labral injuries (11%). Of the 18 SLAP tears, 14 (78%) were type 2, 3 (17%) were type 3, and 1 (5%) was type 4. None of the patients with a SLAP tear presented with symptoms of instability. MR Arthrogram had a 76% sensitivity for detecting SLAP tears. By 6 months postsurgery, 89% of patients were satisfied. Patients with isolated SLAP tears were the quickest to return to sports, at an average of 2.6 months postsurgery. Conclusions: SLAP tears are a common injury in rugby players. These can often be diagnosed with MR arthrography. Arthroscopic repair is associated with excellent results and early return to sports.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据