4.3 Article

Use of monoclonal antibodies to assess expression of anaphylatoxin receptors in tubular epithelial cells of human, murine and rat kidneys

期刊

IMMUNOBIOLOGY
卷 212, 期 2, 页码 129-139

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2006.11.003

关键词

complement; kidney; immunohistochemistry; renal tubular epithelial cells; monoclonal antibody

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To assess published evidence of anaphylatoxin receptor expression in renal tubular epithelia] cells, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against human, mouse and rat receptors for C5a and C3a (C5aR, C3aR) were raised using receptor-expressing transfectants as immunogens. Applying these reagents in immunohistochemistry, we observed that mAbs with reactivities against three distinct epitopes of human C5aR N-terminus recognized tissue macrophages but not at all renal tubular epithelial cells. These findings were surprising, as strong tubular staining had been previously demonstrated by mAbs raised against a synthetic N-terminal C5aR peptide. To extend our study to mammalian kidneys, renal specimens from normal rats as well as LPS-treated Balb/c and MRL/1pr mice, which suffered from lupus-type nephritis, were examined. Similar to humans, mAbs against murine or rat C5aR strongly recognized infiltrating leukocytes in situ whereas tubular epithelial cells remained negative. As a mAb has been previously used to document C3aR expression in renal tubular epithelia] cells, kidney specimens were examined using newly established mAbs against different epitopes of human, murine and rat C3aR. In contrast to published evidence, C3aR was detectable exclusively in interstitial leukocytes but not in epithelia] tubular cells of normal and diseased tissues. Taken together, our findings question a direct involvement of tubular epithelial cells in anaphylatoxin-mediated renal inflammation. Furthermore, as we demonstrate in the case of anaphylatoxin receptors, cross-reactivities of mAbs may constitute as yet underestimated pitfalls in immunohistochemical antigen detection. (c) 2006 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据