4.0 Article

Enhanced development of porcine embryos cloned from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells

期刊

出版社

UNIV BASQUE COUNTRY UPV-EHU PRESS
DOI: 10.1387/ijdb.062165hj

关键词

mesenchymal stem cells; nuclear transfer; porcine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, we have characterized an isolated population of porcine bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for multilineage commitment and compared the developmental potential of cloned embryos with porcine MSCs and fetal fibroblasts (FFs). MSCs exhibited robust alkaline phosphatase activity and later transformed into mineralized nodules following osteoinduction. Furthermore, MSCs underwent adipogenic and chondrogenic differentiation by producing lipid droplets and proteoglycans, respectively. Primary cultures of FFs from a female fetus at similar to 30 day of gestation were established. Donor cells at 3-4 passage were employed for nuclear transfer (INIT). Cell cycle analysis showed that the majority of MSCs in confluence were in the G0/G1 stage. Cumulus-oocyte complexes were matured and fertilized in vitro (IVF) as control. The cleavage rate was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in IVF than in NT embryos with MSCs and FFs (84.5 +/- 4.6% vs. 52.2 +/- 5.4% and 50.8 +/- 5.2%, respectively). However, blastocyst rates in IVF and NT embryos derived from MSCs (20.6 +/- 2.5% and 18.4 +/-.0%) did not differ, but were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than NT derived from FFs (9.5 +/- 2.1%). Total cell number and the ratio of ICM to total cells among blastocysts cloned from MSCs (34.4 +/- 5.2 and 0.38 +/- 0.08, respectively) were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than those from FFs (22.6 +/- 5.5 and 0.18 +/- 0.12, respectively). Proportions of TUNEL positive cells in NTembryosfrom FFs (7.3 +/- 1.8%) were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than in MSCs (4.6 +/- 1.3%) and IVF (2.5 +/- 0.9%). The results clearly demonstrate that multipotent bone marrow MSCs have a greater potential as donor cells than FFs in achieving enhanced production of cloned porcine embryos.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据