4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

A simple model system for age-dependent DNA damage and cancer

期刊

MECHANISMS OF AGEING AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 128, 期 1, 页码 45-49

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2006.11.009

关键词

DNA mutations; cancer; life span extension; gross chromosomal rearrangements

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG01028, K01 AG001028, AG20642, R01 AG025135, R01 AG020642] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG025135, R01AG020642] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aging is the major risk factor for many human cancers. However, the mechanisms responsible for the effect of aging on tumor incidence are poorly understood, in part because few model systems are available to study age-dependent genomic instability. Furthermore, the role of DNA mutations in normal aging and life span extension is unclear. Our laboratory has developed a novel method to study aging in yeast based on the survival of non-dividing populations (chronological life span). Two major pathways have been identified that control chronological aging: the Ras/PKA/Msn2/4 and the Sch9 pathways. The downregulation of either of them promotes life span extension. Importantly, similar pathways (insulin/IGF-I-like), regulate longevity in higher eukaryotes suggesting a common evolutionary origin for the life span-regulatory mechanisms. Moreover, both Ras and Sch9 are functional homologs of two major mammalian oncogenes (Ras and Akt), which underlines the close link between cancer and aging. By combining chronological life span with simple assays for the detection of DNA mutations and dedifferentiation we have developed a powerful system to identify genes that regulate genomic instability and understand the fundamental mechanisms that may be responsible for age-dependent DNA mutations and cancer in mammals. Here, we describe the use of this system to monitor the age-dependent accumulation of different types of DNA mutations including base substitutions, frame-shift mutations, and gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs). (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据