4.5 Article

Frost damage on the terminal shoot as a risk factor of fork incidence on common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)

期刊

ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE
卷 64, 期 1, 页码 79-86

出版社

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1051/forest:2006091

关键词

forks; Fagus silvatica; frost damage; relative risk; attributive fraction of risk; plantation

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Forking is a frequent flaw in beech which can adversely affect the formation of high quality logs. Even though the hypothesis that late frosts increase forking is widely accepted by forest managers, it remains to be proved and quantified experimentally. Damage caused by a late frost on 15 May 1995 to young beech trees in an experimental site at Lyons-La-Foret (France) and the consequences on the development of forking were analysed. The beech trees were 17 years old with heights between 1.5 and 9 m. Of all the plantation densities tested only the lowest density (625/ha) showed various and severe frost damage. Three levels of immediate damage to the growing terminal shoot were observed, with increasing intensity from: (1) no trace of frost damage, (2) reddened leaves and (3) frost-nipped shoots. The intensity of visible damage to the terminal shoot appeared to be very dependent on the height of the plant which justified our original experimental approach, based on an evaluation of the damage for each individual. Almost all of the beech trees less than 4 m high suffered frost damage and all those taller than 7 m were unaffected. Three-year-old forks due to frost which occured in May 1995 were recorded at the end of 1997 using an objective definition based on dendrometric and age criteria. The worst frost damage resulted in a significant increase in the risk of fork emergence (71.7% of the plants were forked). With a risk related to forking in the presence of frost-nipped shoots equal to 2.15 and a fraction of the attributed risk of 0.36 it was concluded that the late frost observed played a significant role in the degradation of the shape of the beech affected by frost and the overall quality of the stand.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据