4.7 Review

Extracellular adenosine metabolism in immune cells in melanoma

期刊

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
卷 63, 期 10, 页码 1073-1080

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-014-1553-8

关键词

Immunosuppression; Adenosine; Myeloid-derived suppressor cells; T cells; Melanoma; PIVAC 13

资金

  1. German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ)
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of Israel (MOST) [CA157]
  3. Else-Kroner Fresenius Foundation [2010.A124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Malignant melanoma is characterized by the development of chronic inflammation in the tumor microenvironment, which leads to a strong immunosuppression associated with a rapid tumor progression. Adenosine is considered as one of the main immunosuppressive factors in the tumor environment. It is produced via enzymatic hydrolysis of extracellular ATP by ectonucleotidases CD39 and CD73 localized on cell surface. Using the ret transgenic mouse melanoma model that closely mimics human melanoma, we demonstrated an increased frequency of ectonucleotidase-positive myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in melanoma lesions and lymphoid organs. Furthermore, we observed that conventional CD4(+)FoxP3(-) and CD8(+) T cells infiltrating melanoma lesions of ret transgenic mice were distinctly enriched in the CD39(+)CD73(+) subpopulation that co-expressed also PD-1. Ectonucleotidase expression was also up-regulated in CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells upon activation. In addition, these ectoenzymes were largely found to be expressed on memory T cell compartment (in particular, on effector memory cells). Our data suggest that extracellular adenosine produced by regulatory T cells (Tregs) and MDSCs can suppress T cell effector functions through paracrine signaling. Another mechanism involves its production also by effector T cells and an inhibition of their anti-tumor reactivity via autocrine signaling as a part of the negative feedback loop. This mode of adenosine signaling could be also used by Tregs and MDSCs to enhance their immunosuppressive activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据