4.7 Article

Signals through 4-1BB inhibit T regulatory cells by blocking IL-9 production enhancing antitumor responses

期刊

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
卷 60, 期 12, 页码 1775-1787

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-011-1075-6

关键词

Tregs; 4-1BB; IL-9; Tumor immunotherapy; CpG-ODN

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA 114336, AG287510]
  2. American Federation for Aging Research (AFAR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies from our laboratory indicate that intratumoral (i.t.) injections of CpG-ODN are the most effective adjuvant strategy to induce an antitumor immune response in tolerant BALB-neuT mice but insufficient for tumor eradication. We evaluated whether this treatment strategy could be enhanced by the presence of anti-OX40 and anti-4-1BB antibodies. Treatment with anti-4-1BB resulted in a greater antitumor response than anti-OX40. The results indicate that anti-4-1BB but not anti-OX40 inhibited the suppressive function of T regulatory cells (Tregs). Through microarray analysis we evaluated the mechanism by which anti-4-1BB inhibits iTregs using the Foxp3-GFP mice. We observed specific transcriptional differences in over 100 genes in iTregs treated with anti-4-1BB, and selected those genes that remained unaffected by exposure to anti-OX40. Interleukin 9 was transcriptionally down-regulated 28-fold by anti-4-1BB treatment, and this was matched by a significant reduction of IL-9 secretion by iTregs. Furthermore, blockade of the common gamma-chain receptor resulted in the inhibition of iTreg-suppressive function. More importantly, neutralization of IL-9 plus i.t. injections of CpG-ODN induces tumor rejection in BALB-neuT and MUC-1 tolerant transgenic mice. These results indicate that IL-9 plays a role in iTreg biology during the tumor inflammatory process enhancing/promoting the suppressive function of these cells and that the blockade of IL-9 could serve as a novel strategy to modulate the function of Tregs to enhance the antitumor effect of tumor vaccines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据