4.7 Article

Pitfalls of vaccinations with WT1-, Proteinase3-and MUC1-derived peptides in combination with MontanideISA51 and CpG7909

期刊

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
卷 60, 期 2, 页码 161-171

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-010-0929-7

关键词

Vaccination; AML; MM; T cell; CpG; WT1

资金

  1. Laupitz Stiftung
  2. Wilhelm Sander Stiftung
  3. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society [LS-7008]
  4. NIH [CA18029, CA33084]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

T cells with specificity for antigens derived from Wilms Tumor gene (WT1), Proteinase3 (Pr3), and mucin1 (MUC1) have been demonstrated to lyse acute myeloid leukemia (AML) blasts and multiple-myeloma (MM) cells, and strategies to enhance or induce such tumor-specific T cells by vaccination are currently being explored in multiple clinical trials. To test safety and immunogenicity of a vaccine composed of WT1-, Pr3-, and MUC1-derived Class I-restricted peptides and the pan HLA-DR T helper cell epitope (PADRE) or MUC1-helper epitopes in combination with CpG7909 and MontanideISA51, four patients with AML and five with MM were repetitively vaccinated. No clinical responses were observed. Neither pre-existing nor naive WT1-/Pr3-/MUC1-specific CD8(+) T cells expanded in vivo by vaccination. In contrast, a significant decline in vaccine-specific CD8(+) T cells was observed. An increase in PADRE-specific CD4(+) T helper cells was observed after vaccination but these appeared unable to produce IL2, and CD4(+) T cells with a regulatory phenotype increased. Taken into considerations that multiple clinical trials with identical antigens but different adjuvants induced vaccine-specific T cell responses, our data caution that a vaccination with leukemia-associated antigens can be detrimental when combined with MontanideISA51 and CpG7909. Reflecting the time-consuming efforts of clinical trials and the fact that 1/3 of ongoing peptide vaccination trails use CpG and/or Montanide, our data need to be taken into consideration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据