4.5 Article

Efficiency of early selection for rotation-aged wood quality traits in radiata pine

期刊

ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE
卷 64, 期 1, 页码 1-9

出版社

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1051/forest:2006082

关键词

early selection; microfibril angle; modulus of elasticity; wood density; radiata pine

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A total of 360 bark-to-bark-through-pith wood strips were sampled at breast height from 180 trees in 30 open-pollinated families from two rotation-aged genetic trials to study inheritance, age-age genetic correlation, and early selection efficiency for wood quality traits in radiata pine. Wood strips were evaluated by SilviScan((R)) and annual pattern and genetic parameters for growth, wood density, microfibril angle (MFA), and stiffness (modulus of elasticity: MOE) for early to rotation ages were estimated. Annual ring growth was the largest between ages 2 - 5 years from pith, and decreased linearly to ages 9 - 10. Annual growth was similar and consistent at later ages. Wood density was the lowest near the pith, increased steadily to age 11 - 15 years, then was relatively stable after these ages. MFA was highest (35 degrees.) near the pith and reduced to about 10. at age 10 - 15 years. MFA was almost unchanged at later ages. MOE increased from about 2.5 GPa near the pith to about 20 GPa at ages 11 - 15 years. MOE was relatively unchanged at later ages. Wood density and MOE were inversely related to MFA. Heritability increased from zero near the pith and stabilised at ages 4 or 5 for all four growth and wood quality traits (DBH, density, MFA and MOE). Across age classes, heritability was the highest for area-weighted density and MFA, lowest for DBH, and intermediate for MOE. Age-age genetic correlations were high for the four traits studied. The genetic correlation reached 0.8 after age 7 for most traits. Early selection for density, MFA and MOE were very effective. Selection at age 7 - 8 has similar effectiveness as selection conducted at rotation age for MFA and MOE and at least 80% effective for wood density.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据