4.1 Article

Leukotriene B-4-mediated release of antimicrobial peptides against cytomegalovirus is BLT1 dependent

期刊

VIRAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 20, 期 3, 页码 407-420

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/vim.2006.0099

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Leukotriene B4 (LTB4) is a potent lipid mediator of inflammation that possesses antiviral activities. Here we provide evidence that LTB4-mediated defense against in vitro cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection of human leukocytes involves activation of the high-affinity LTB4 receptor (BLT1) and neutrophil degranulation. Treatment of CMV-infected peripheral blood leukocytes with LTB4 (10 nM) leads to a significant reduction in viral titers. This activity involves neutrophil activation through the BLT1 receptor, because no reduction in viral titers was observed after neutrophil depletion from cellular preparation or when leukocytes were pretreated with the BLT1 antagonist U75302. Direct stimulation of neutrophils with LTB4 (in the presence or absence of CMV) leads to the release of myeloperoxidase, alpha-defensins, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin, and the human cathelicidin LL-37 in a BLT1-dependent manner. LTB4 does not act exclusively on the secretion of preformed antimicrobial peptides, but also acts on the synthesis of selected peptides as reflected by the increase in transcriptional levels of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) and LL-37 in LTB4-treated neutrophils. Treatment of cell cultures with neutralizing antibodies directed against alpha-defensins, EDN, and LL-37 significantly reduces the antiviral effect of LTB4, suggesting that LTB4 may act through the release of antimicrobial peptides. Ex vivo experiments using LTB4-treated neutrophils from peritoneal washing of wild-type and BLT1 knockout mice further supported the role played by antimicrobial peptides in LTB4-mediated antiviral activity toward CMV. These results provide evidence of a mechanism by which LTB4 induces host defense against viral infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据